"All of this information will pertain to my daily practice. I love courses with lots of visual information and examples and this course definitely delivered!" L.R. (Dec. 2024)

"It was helpful to discuss the Endoscopic view as it relates to fluoroscopy (observing both simultaneously)." H.B. (Dec. 2024)

"Side by side FEES and MBSS images were beneficial." L.B. (Nov. 2024)

"Very concrete and easy to follow course." M.P. (Nov. 2024)

"I really appreciated the examples of FEES, always showing what the speaker was explaining. The rhythm was not too fast. There were a lot of examples (FEES videos)." A.F. (Oct. 2024)

"The many examples of FEES and structure descriptions were beneficial. I also loved the fact that there were repetitions and slow-motion videos." M.L. (Oct. 2024)

"The portion on Imaging Swallow Dysfunction was very helpful. I liked the specifics about inferring dysfunction based on what's seen on the FEES." K.L. (Oct. 2024)

"So many video examples with a good pace of presenter's discussion." R.Z. (Aug. 2024)

"All areas of this presentation were helpful - we are starting a FEES program and this course was wonderful. I liked the ease of navigation and extent of information." M.L. (Aug. 2024)

"The visualization of abnormal swallows was beneficial. So many videos to watch with excellent explanation." L.H. (Aug. 2024)

"Aspiration Rating Scale was helpful. I liked the variety of visuals, real videos of FEES." D.V. (Aug. 2024)

"I am a beginner FEES clinician. The entire course was beneficial. I enjoyed the videos to demonstrate swallowing assessments via FEES vs VF." K.W. (Jun. 2024)

"I enjoyed the case studies and videos of patient Swallow function/Dysfunction." C.G. (Jun. 2024)

"Great course! I can't identify any one part that was most helpful. I liked that I could move slowly and review the EXCELLENT VIDEOS." D.D. (Jun. 2024)

"The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Scale was beneficial. I liked the explanation of imaging, possible deficits and use of direct interventions." L.M. (May 2024)

"Advocating for FEES in our facility. I enjoyed the ease of taking this course. Presenter was very knowledgeable." R.M. (Apr. 2024)

"The FEES procedures and results were beneficial. I enjoyed the videos of actual FEES, and the side-by-side with VFSS and FEES was excellent for learning." P.G. (Mar. 2024)

"This course was easy to understand." C.G. (Mar. 2024)

"The techniques were helpful. I liked the multiple examples." L.E. (Feb. 2024)

"Beneficial topics included credentialing, use of topical anesthetic, standards varying by state, and standards set forth by EU & Canada. I liked the videos." J.S. (Feb. 2024)

"Excellent and well-presented course!! Loved it!" N.D. (Feb. 2024)

"Discussing the abnormal findings was beneficial. I liked everything!" A.A. (Jan. 2024)

“The entire presentation exceeded my expectations. Well done! The presenter is well-versed and extremely knowledgeable - and his delivery was easily understood by the listener. He provided a vast amount of information that was evidence-based. I especially found it helpful that most of the content was cited by reputable authors/journals so that I could review the information he used in this presentation." S.W. (Jan. 2024)

"Interventions/strategies after completion of FEES were beneficial. Informative education for an SLP to provide and implement in the SNF setting." L.E. (Dec. 2023)

"Making inferences from endoscopic findings that can determine the integrity of swallow events. I’ve performed hundreds of videofluoroscopic exams but only a handful of FEES exams. I learned information about swallowing function that was brand new to me. Incredibly valuable course." C.G. (Dec. 2023)

"I enjoyed the videos." M.K. (Dec. 2023)

"Discussing the FEES process was beneficial. I liked the course clarity and professionalism." E.S. (Nov. 2023)

"The use of studies and conclusions, lidocaine use, ASP-PEN scale practice, and indications for fluoroscopic vs. FEES were beneficial topics. I enjoyed the imaging combined with Dr. Murray's commentary." M.F. (Nov. 2023)

"The visual aids were great with side-by-side Fluoro and FEES." L.T. (Nov. 2023)

"The discussion on FEES vs Videofluoroscopy was beneficial. I liked the videos and review of anatomy." M.T. (Oct. 2023)

"Many videos that illustrated the detection of penetration/aspiration, the Yale Rating Scale for residuals, the detailed instructions on how to evaluate epiglottic inversion, pharyngeal wall constriction, and where to position the scope were all beneficial." J.W. (Oct. 2023)

"The presenter is clearly quite skilled and is an excellent instructor. I appreciate so much the very practical nature of his instruction!" J.W. (Oct. 2023)

"Refreshed and organized information about the swallow." R.C. (Oct. 2023)

"Passing the scope, interpretation of swallow disorders, and the simultaneous views of FEES and VF were very helpful." H.M. (Sep. 2023)

"Viewing the video recordings of the scopes was beneficial." R.K. (Sep. 2023)

"Comparison of VFSS to FEES and how they differ was helpful. I liked the images of the pharynx and larynx." K.C. (Aug. 2023)

"Good, clear explanations. Imaging swallow dysfunction was a beneficial topic. I liked the opportunity to view swallows in both real-time and in slow motion." E.H. (Jul. 2023)

"Excellent information with a clear, slow presentation during anatomy presentations." K.G. (Jun. 2023)

"Every part of this presentation was informative and important. It has been several years since I last completed FEES. I am starting a new job and they want someone to do FEES. It was helpful to review the anatomy so many times and to review each video several times to truly assess the swallow. Loved how many times the speaker reviewed the videos to clearly visualize the swallow." T.F. (Jun. 2023)

"I liked the video examples of the FEES exams. I found Dr. Murray's descriptions and analysis very helpful. The outline and chapter format were beneficial to my learning. Having the pdf of the slides was a nice bonus." S.M. (Jun. 2023)

"Placement of the scope and all of the anatomical information was beneficial. I liked the vivid videos and images with detailed information." K.S. (Mar. 2023)

"The overall thoroughness of this course was exceptional. I am an experienced endoscopist but haven't been practicing for some time, and I found this course to be extremely informational. I will recommend this course to new and experienced endoscopists!" M.M. (Feb. 2023)

"Tips on how to interpret images and infer correctly deficits. Clear explanations by Joseph Murray and various videos." F.S. (Feb. 2023)

"Indications of use of FEES vs Fluoroscopy. Course was organized and easy to follow for beginners." L.R. (Jan. 2023)

"The considerations for implementation of FEES, general protocol, and review of the observation period prior to initiation of the exam. I also found the images of the Yale Residue Scale helpful. I appreciated the side by side MBS and FEES views; also, the resources and research studies to clarify findings and engage clinical thinking skills. Very helpful." K.O. (Jan. 2023)

"Detailed views and discussion of swallows. Footage of real swallows and intervention discussion was beneficial." S.W. (Jan. 2023)

"I liked the examples with analysis, indications for choosing FEES, and visual examples with instructor describing." L.S. (Dec. 2022)

"I enjoyed the side-by-side VFSS/FEES images and the great review of anatomy. I also enjoyed the level of detail and direct applicability to my practice." L.M. (Dec. 2022)

"Dr. Murray is an excellent presenter and his rate of speaking was great to process the more complex information." J.C. (Dec. 2022)

"The instructor was very informative and kept the material interesting and understandable. I liked the discussion of FEES vs MBS - pros and cons." A.K. (Nov. 2022)

"How to infer aspiration during the swallow despite the period of white-out was beneficial. I liked the multiple video examples." C.G. (Nov. 2022)

"All of it was great! We are starting FEES by SLPs in the spring. I liked all of the examples." M.B. (Nov. 2022)

"Video examples were helpful." V.B. (Nov. 2022)

"The imaging swallowing dysfunction section was beneficial to my practice. Lots of examples and videos." S.B. (Oct. 2022)

"I would recommend this course." H.H. (Sept. 2022)

"This is my first introduction to FEES. I liked everything about this course - very helpful!" E.N. (Aug. 2022)

"I found the discussion re: the differences in retention ratings between FEES and VFSS interesting. It will make me consider what retention visualized on VFSS might look like via FEES and vice versa, and consider whether I'd make differing recommendations." R.K. (Aug. 2022)

"Easy to follow and pick up where you left off. Good review of anatomy and physiology with FEES process/protocol." K.C. (Aug. 2022)

"It was well organized with a good balance of research and practical knowledge." R.K. (Aug. 2022)

"Good videos with explanation. The entire presentation was beneficial."  E.N. (Aug. 2022)

"I love Joe Murray. Very clear delivery of information. Very easy-to-listen-to voice. Would love to see more continuing ed from him on NSS." K.I. (June 2022)

"Liked the use of patient videos and review of footage w/ narration of anatomic and physiologic findings." R.R. (June 2022)

"Practical applications and in-depth discussion of physiological inferences from exam." M.J. (Mar. 2022)

"I liked the comparison of VFSS to FEES in real time. The course was comprehensive by a highly reputable presenter." A.W. (Feb. 2022)

"I liked all the videos of FEES and anatomy explanations." C.H. (Jan. 2022)

This program is offered for 0.4 ASHA CEUs (Intermediate Level; Professional Area).

ASHA CEUs: NSS online courses are registered with ASHA and are offered for ASHA CEUs. The number of ASHA CEUs is noted above. Note that 0.1 ASHA CEU = 1 contact hour = equals 1 CEE.

ASHA CEUs: Attendees must meet at least one of the following conditions in order to be eligible to earn ASHA CEUs:

• Current ASHA Member
• ASHA Certificate of Clinical Competence (CCC) Holder
• Licensed by a state or provincial regulatory agency to practice speech-language pathology (SLP) or audiology
• Credentialed by a state regulatory agency to practice SLP or audiology
• Credentialed by a national regulatory agency to practice SLP or audiology
• Engaged in a Clinical Fellowship under the supervision of an individual with their ASHA CCC
• Currently enrolled in a master's or doctoral program in SLP or audiology

If an attendee is not an ASHA member or CCC holder but meets any of the above criteria, they may inform the ASHA CE Registry of their eligibility by visiting this site.