"Always good to review components and sharpen one's accuracy in use of the instrument. Dr. Martin-Harris had some great anecdotes and factoids." C.H. (Nov. 2024)

"The new research supporting assessment on the 17 components. The review of the scoring in addition to the common errors. I really appreciated the updated views of the images. Course was well rounded with good explanation of the Assessment tool, the current research supporting the functional assessment components, and how this tool can be used to guide therapeutic interventions. The case study was a nice touch to put it all together in great detail." K.B. (Nov. 2024)

"Review of each component was beneficial. I liked the new research." C.J. (Oct. 2024)

"Beneficial review of the specific details of scoring - it's always helpful to have reminders after a while. Also, the review connecting component scores/impairments to EBP treatment approaches was a concise reminder. I liked that I could take the test/save and come back to the test and work at my own pace." A.L. (Oct. 2024)

"I really enjoyed the updated information for scoring the various components & emphasis on how components can direct the development of a plan of care. Well laid out & very practical." A.C. (Oct. 2024)

"Updated research was beneficial. I liked the inclusion of MBS videos featuring impairments." L.P. (Oct. 2024)

"New research and new training methods, as well as documentation that can be uploaded to Epic. Practical information that was to the point." L.W. (Oct. 2024)

"I liked all of the information, particularly radiation evidence." L.M. (Oct. 2024)

"I liked how Dr. Bonnie Martin Harris provided more specific definitions and anatomic locations on how to rate certain components of the MBSImP." A.M. (Oct. 2024)

"It was beneficial discussing functional categories based on Oral and Pharyngeal total scores. I liked the updated information and research." C.B. (Sep. 2024)

"I enjoyed going over the scoring on all the components." S.W. (Sep. 2024)

"The updated information on oral and pharyngeal severity will be very helpful." K.M. (Sep. 2024)

"Great examples of scoring and reference sheets." A.R. (Sep. 20

"Great pace, and the side-by-side examples were very helpful." A.G. (Sep. 2024)

"Video demonstrations, research studies to support findings were beneficial. Very good explanations as to how certain components impact swallow and why all components and trials are important." S.M. (Aug. 2024)

"I enjoyed the research introduction and updates. Enjoyed learning how the components are affected by each technique- strategy. It is so beneficial to SLPs who are doing a direct intervention." F.H. (Aug. 2024)

"Discussing what areas are difficult for clinicians and where we should be looking was beneficial. I liked the updates." C.M. (Aug. 2024)

"Beneficial review of videos and current issues. Nice, condensed and current research was helpful." A.T. (Aug. 2024)

"Review of the laryngeal elevation identification was beneficial." S.L. (Jul. 2024)

"I always appreciate the review of scoring each component. The information re: pps and fps is most helpful to me at the current moment as we are trying to see if we can increase our hospital’s radiology department policy on pps and fps for our equipment as they are below the 30 recommended. Again, the in-depth review of scoring for each component is always helpful. Slides were well written too to limit the amount of side note-taking that I had to do." L.T. (Jul. 2024)

"Review of component scoring was beneficial." D.C. (Jul. 2024)

"All of the review was incredibly helpful." A.H. (May. 2024)

"The overview and updates from the last time I renewed my MBSImP certification were very helpful. Thank you. The level of detail that Dr. Martin-Harris went into with regard to the anatomy and physiology of the swallow, each component and the frequently missed sections. I also appreciated the case study at the end of the course. Thank you, also, for the preview test. The addition of highlighting research was interesting and appreciated. Thank you." I.F. (May. 2024)

"I complete an average of 2-3 MBS a week and help train new staff. This is always such a good course. I enjoyed the thoroughness of the information." L.F. (May. 2024)

"The clarifications of scoring were helpful. I also liked the illustrations of differences in scoring." B.M. (May. 2024)

"I enjoyed how the case study was used to translate the evaluation into an intervention plan. It was a good update for someone who is experienced with dysphagia and VFSS but wants to improve scoring and interpretations." H.H. (May. 2024)

"The scoring components with examples were beneficial." P.D. (Apr. 2024)

"Review of scoring, particularly Components 8 and 15 which have always been a bit challenging for me. Straightforward notes and presentation." C.C. (Apr. 2024)

"Consistency viscosity comparisons of Varibar to IDDSI was helpful. I liked the review of the components." E.L. (Apr. 2024)

"The updated informational materials were beneficial. I liked the review of the frequently missed concepts on each swallowing component explained." M.A. (Mar. 2024)

"I appreciated the update on all the literature as well as the case study. Online and excellent slides." S.B. (Mar. 2024)

"I appreciated the attention to the scoring of components that can be problematic and appreciated the video examples of each. I liked the ease of access and clinical usefulness." K.N. (Mar. 2024)

"Great refresher for information. I enjoyed the thorough explanations." D.W. (Mar. 2024)

"Reviewing radiology safety, and use of the supraglottic technique were helpful to discuss. I enjoyed the new research." A.B. (Mar. 2024)

"Very practical! Beneficial review of specific components with suggestions for testing. Updates on recent research." C.S. (Mar. 2024)

"Reviewing updated findings (e.g., severity ratings) was beneficial. I liked the combination of modes of presentation." T.B. (Feb. 2024)

"Oral Total and Pharyngeal Total impairment profiles were beneficial topics. I enjoyed the lecture." K.M. (Feb. 2024)

"Refresher on specific physiologic components, highlighting common difficulty. Wasn't just another review, but focused on areas beneficial to a more seasoned clinician." A.P. (Feb. 2024)

"The sequence of administration of boluses was beneficial. I enjoyed the clarity of the videos." K.M. (Feb. 2024)

"I enjoyed reviewing the training sections." H.E. (Feb. 2024)

"I loved the case studies and how to make specific treatments work. The course was convenient, and I did not have to do it all in one shot and could come back to it." J.K. (Feb. 2024)

"Examples and discussion of pharyngeal contraction and the discussion of the contribution of tongue base retraction and laryngeal elevation on epiglottis inversion were beneficial. I liked the examples of the different impairment scores for each component." K.K. (Feb. 2024)

"All of the course was helpful and addressed some questions I had." K.M. (Jan. 2024)

"Dr. BMH continues to refine the MBSImP. Looking forward to more publications on translating the OT and PT Total Scores to dysphagia severity levels. This course was organized and concise. Material is broken down very well." E.K. (Jan. 2024)

"I liked the updates to teaching related to frequent errors in scoring and with literature." J.D. (Jan. 2024)

"I really liked the concrete examples with slides. This course was very comprehensive yet succinct." K.B. (Jan. 2024)

"Excellent refresher. All of this course was beneficial! I liked being able to take the course virtually." E.B. (Jan. 2024)

"The case study and treatment options indicated by MBSImP scores were helpful. The course was organized in a very easy to follow and easy to learn way." J.L. (Jan. 2024)

"Beneficial information on radiation and I liked the review of components." K.W. (Dec. 2023)

"Helpful to review common errors with the 17 components. It was interesting to learn about research re: barium risk, Oral Total and Pharyngeal Total impairment scores, and normal variability within some of the 17 scores. I liked learning about the research that has been done based on MBSImP." J.M. (Dec. 2023)

"Discussing common mistakes in scoring and reviewing thoroughly the correct anatomical landmarks for judging each component were helpful. Thorough course, the handouts were helpful, and the test corresponded well to the material." C.L. (Dec. 2023)

"This course gave me confidence in my scoring. Using anatomical landmarks for scoring was beneficial." S.H. (Dec. 2023)

"I liked the clarifications on the most missed items." K.M. (Dec. 2023)

"This course clarified many of the questions I had regarding the scoring of the MBSImP." A.J. (Dec. 2023)

"I really appreciated how the presenter addressed the questions raised by clinicians and provided details regarding these concerns. I also really appreciated the intervention plan model, which emphasizes the physiological parameters of swallowing targeted as therapeutical goals. I enjoyed the data from scientific literature throughout the presentation." E.R. (Nov. 2023)

"The research and evidence of the effectiveness of MBSImP was beneficial. I liked the updated information." E.B. (Nov. 2023)

"The case study was beneficial. Going through all of the components." E.S. (Nov. 2023)

"I found the sample targeted intervention plan for the case study especially helpful. I think the MBSImP is an essential assessment tool, and translating study findings to a structured intervention plan was reaffirming and highly beneficial. I liked that the course was split into easily watchable segments and the sample scores with accompanying video (especially the pharyngeal stripping wave)!" E.L. (Nov. 2023)

"All of the updated research that supports various components of the protocol was beneficial. I liked the real videos paired with a discussion about each scoring criteria for each component." K.T. (Nov. 2023)

"I enjoyed hearing the updates and latest info from Dr. Martin Harris." M.V. (Oct. 2023)

"Updated practice, presentation of research papers, clarification of components. I liked the examples and substantiating information." L.T. (Oct. 2023)

"Practical information which I can easily implement into my daily work. Reviewed component scoring and updated practices." D.S. (Oct. 2023)

"Relating scores/deficits to interventions was beneficial." K.M. (Oct. 2023)

"I liked the review of recent literature relating to MBSImP." A.C. (Oct. 2023)

"Clear and concise information. I found the overall review to be helpful as I found some of the scoring I had been doing to be not completely correct." J.D. (Oct. 2023)

"I really appreciated the review of the component scoring though the lens of most common errors. I also appreciated the case study which demonstrated how you would proceed with treatment. I was able to start and stop as my schedule allowed, that flexibility is very beneficial." E.B. (Sep. 2023)

"Radiation exposure was helpful to discuss. This course was a great review of scoring." M.S. (Sep. 2023)

"I really liked that this course delved into the practical applications for some of the scoring (applications for therapy, what might be compensatory movement for certain deficits, etc) beyond just how to score. This course felt more tailored to advanced practitioners, so it aligned with my current experience and skill set." C.E. (Sep. 2023)

"I found the case study to be most beneficial. I liked seeing the principles applied in real life." L.L. (Sep. 2023)

"I liked the review of scoring and then how it can be interpreted for therapy." L.M. (Sep. 2023)

"I liked that this course focused on common mistakes / problems. It also gave lots of great little tips and tricks for what to do in clinical practice." J.W. (Sep. 2023)

"Good refresher. I liked Dr. Martin-Harris' explanations on each component." C.E. (Aug. 2023)

"I liked seeing examples of the different impairments that would be scored differently. This course was easy to access and follow." J.T. (Aug. 2023)

"The application of assessment results to treatment objectives was beneficial. I liked the multiple videos with examples, and the MBSImP guide that corresponds with the videos and has the tips that were discussed in the course." A.H. (Aug. 2023)

"Bonnie is a great teacher. I liked the review of scoring specific components." H.H. (Aug. 2023)

"Straightforward. I liked the evidence based rationale for protocol." J.F. (Jul. 2023)

"I found the research updates to be quite helpful. It was also very helpful to be reminded of how to score certain components when there are gray areas or variations." A.V. (Jun. 2023)

"I liked the review of the esophageal clearance component - what it assesses and what it does not assess." S.M. (Jun. 2023)

"Discussing short and long term therapy goals was beneficial. This course was well organized." S.B. (May 2023)

"Research presented in very eye-friendly ways to show leadership regarding Varibar use/consistency and frames per second." A.D. (May 2023)

"I found the new research updates to be thought-provoking and informative. I also really liked the case study because it clearly demonstrated how establishing goals that targeted specific components from the MBSImP scoring can make such an impact on the plan of care." K.P. (Apr. 2023)

"I always learn something every time Dr. Martin-Harris presents. I loved the case study - how the goals were written and impairment-targeted therapy. Hearing her describe each component, the frequent errors seen, and reviewing the anatomy was incredibly beneficial. I liked the pace, the content, and the evidence/articles that were presented. I love Dr. Martin-Harris. I thought this course was all incredibly well done." K.M. (Apr. 2023)

"I appreciated the clarification regarding some of the more commonly confused items on the MBSImP. I appreciated the videos and examples." K.L. (Apr. 2023)

"I liked the discussions of EB papers. Very nice synthesis." A.B. (Apr. 2023)

"I liked all of it. This course was a great review." K.V. (Apr. 2023)

"It's always helpful to have a review of the material, even if you utilize it every day. I liked the case study." E.T. (Apr. 2023)

"Evidence-based application for each component. I loved the case study. Great presenter and excellent content." J.P. (Mar. 2023)

"Review of MBSImP scoring, especially with updates, was beneficial." M.T. (Mar. 2023)

"I liked the review of scoring in regards to tips and the most beneficial information was highlighted when scoring each component. I also really appreciated the case study. I liked the ability to go back and review certain portions as sometimes it was beneficial to hear the information more than once. I also appreciated that the course kept my place when I had to stop and then return to the course." S.B. (Mar. 2023)

"Review of what, where, when to score. I liked the MBS studies of each component." D.H. (Mar. 2023)

"The clarification and "takeaway" points that have been made since I first took the training were beneficial. Easy to access course. Anatomy illustrations were very helpful." M.J. (Mar. 2023)

"I liked the scoring details and troubleshooting for individual components." V.S. (Feb. 2023)

"It was all helpful and relevant - update on literature that applies to MBSImP concepts, the review of components highlighting what clinicians frequently do in error, and the case study." L.M. (Feb. 2023)

"I liked the clarification of frequently missed concepts, convenience and flexibility of course." S.P. (Feb. 2023)

"The information on categorizing mild, moderate, and severe impairment was beneficial. I liked the updated research literature on swallowing to support the use of MBSImP." R.B. (Jan. 2023)

"I loved reviewing the components and videos, and having the chance to preview the test while participating in the lectures." L.T. (Jan. 2023)

"I found it beneficial that we can quantify the levels of impairment based on research versus subjectivity. I liked the inclusion of the latest research and how it applies to our daily practice." J.T. (Jan. 2023)

"This course updated my understanding of scoring the MBSImP." S.B. (Jan. 2023)

"Very detailed and thorough course. Great review and references." D.E. (Dec. 2022)

"I liked the sections on common errors in scoring. The literature review related to MBSImP scoring was beneficial." D.B. (Dec. 2022)

"The connection between findings and treatment was beneficial for my daily practice." P.T. (Nov. 2022)

"Always good to review scoring guidelines. I liked the frequently missed info, and the new data on the importance of getting the A/P view." J.O. (Nov. 2022)

"All good! I needed the refresher, and gained some very helpful ideas for wording findings in my reports. I liked the review of select components with a focus on the aspects which are most challenging to clinicians as a whole." K.C. (Nov. 2022)

"Very helpful to go over common errors/difficult scoring aspects of MBSImP with guidance and video explanations." K.H. (Nov. 2022)

"Clear presentation, practical information, new information from past recertification, and re-introduction to the overall benefits of using this standardized protocol in the clinical management of dysphagia patients." C.G. (Oct. 2022)

"All of it was very beneficial for my daily practice. Easy to follow, functional examples provided." M.O. (Oct. 2022)

"The initial overview of barium products was helpful. I also enjoyed the responses to some of the "critiques" of the MBSImP. The protocol and reasoning/rationale/research were very clearly outlined. This was easy to complete in multiple sessions. I liked that it was broken into chunks - that made pausing and returning easier. I also appreciated the downloads." E.T. (Oct. 2022)

"I liked the treatment ideas related to scores on MBSImP, the practical information on why we use the MBSImP, review and updates on scoring, information on common mistakes when scoring, and the multiple choice test." D.B. (Oct. 2022)

"It was a great review. I liked the visuals, explanations, examples." J.W. (Oct. 2022)

"I liked the video examples, explanations of where scoring errors are made, and case study. I liked the application of MBSImP results to treatment planning."  S.R. (Oct. 2022)

"The course is on-demand, mobile friendly." K.K. (Oct. 2022)

"I liked that this specific MBSImP course reviewed challenges that clinicians have with rating certain components and how to be more accurate with the ratings. As always, the visuals and seeing actual MBSs that review each component was extremely helpful." K.H. (Sept. 2022)

"The course is very thorough and supported by literature wherever possible. I enjoyed the in-depth "whys" provided for areas where things are often confused by clinicians, and for certain physiologic explanations made." L.M. (Sept. 2022)

"The ease of completion was nice. Good refresher." J.R. (Sept. 2022)

"The slowed tongue movement with its relationship to delayed initiation, the review of pharyngeal contraction with consideration of preferential flow and enlarged pharyngeal spaces, and the information regarding the availability of the app and its use in patient education at bedside were all beneficial information."  T.M. (Sept. 2022)

"Specific breakdown of areas that are hard to assess. I liked the ease of course access."  S.A.H. (Sept. 2022)

"The course is self-paced, easy to follow, and informative. Liked integration of scoring to functional goals and therapy techniques."  A.T. (Aug. 2022)

"The MBSImP is important for my entire hospital SLP department for continuity of care and assessment."  J.M. (Aug. 2022)

"I will use this information daily."  T.S. (Aug. 2022)

"Liked the updates on research and review of MBSImP components. Very comprehensive review of information."  E.M. (Aug. 2022)

"Very clear information with excellent references."  E.M. (Aug. 2022)

"Liked that I was able to do this at my own pace & go back to concepts I needed to review."  D.S. (July 2022)

"I liked the 'human' aspect by the presenter. The ongoing acknowledgement of learning and responding to frequently asked questions WITH explanations made this presentation resonate across all areas, and brought the clinician learners closer together/on a relatable level with the presenter."  M.S. (July 2022)

"I really appreciated the review, and the supportive research was great! I need to go back and read the articles. Bonnie Martin-Harris is so knowledgeable! Greatly appreciate her work, research and teaching." K.H. (July 2022)

"I liked that Dr. Martin-Harris focused on updates and new information that has come up over the last few years. Thorough and a great review." S.G. (July 2022)

"Good clarifications/refreshers regarding component scoring. I liked that Dr. Martin-Harris continues to teach the course. The objective nature of the Dysphagia Severity Scoring based upon the numbers, the predictive values, targeted intervention plans with treatment, eliminating the subjective mild/moderate/severe statement." R.H. (July 2022)

"I liked the research that supports answers to FAQs." M.S. (July 2022)

"I liked the explanation of items frequently scored incorrectly, information on severity ratings, and step by step guidance through each component scored." T.A. (June 2022)

"The case study was well-outlined. And the overall design of course and visual examples were great!" H.H. (June 2022)

"I really appreciated the review of tricky to score portions of the exam." S.R. (June 2022)

"I liked the highlights of commonly misunderstood practices and reviewing those. I believe it will increase reliability between providers." K.M. (June 2022)

"It was nice to review the material and have the resources provided." L.N. (May 2022)

"As this is a renewal course, it was great to learn what the author reported as frequently asked questions or mistakes in implementing this protocol. It was worth to be asked to take this renewal course to update my learning based on my clinical experiences and advance my performance with higher accuracy." H.C. (May 2022)

"It was a nice refresher on the MBSImP, and I liked that it went over the common errors in scoring." F.W. (May 2022)

"The whole course was excellent and I really appreciated highlighting the typical errors made by clinicians on each scoring component. Glad to improve my assessment practice going forward! Enjoyed the sprinkling of relevant studies and how they relate to MBS assessment and the MBSImP specifically. Really enjoyed the discussion along the way that related to clinical implications in the real world." L.T. (May 2022)

"The case study was helpful in that I was able to quickly formulate three therapeutic techniques when learning that the focus of therapy would be hyolaryngeal movement. It was also good to see the formulation of LTG and STG with objective goal writing. I am motivated to use the report generator and dysphagia app in my practice." N.R. (May 2022)

"I enjoyed the suggestions of target areas for rehabilitation based on deficits." T.K. (May 2022)

"I liked that it was tailored for those of us who have used the MBSImP for many years." L.M. (Apr. 2022)

"I liked the video examples and the review of each component's scoring with updated tips." J.C. (Apr. 2022)

"The format was easy to complete. I appreciated the descriptions of areas where frequent errors in scoring occur." A.O. (Apr. 2022)

"I enjoyed learning about common errors in scoring. I liked the review of the components and updates on the research. This is beneficial in working with younger clinicians and making sure I am up to date. Great course!" A.G. (Mar. 2022)

"It was great to hear about updates from the literature. I especially found the information on tongue base movement contributing to epiglottic movement to be interesting." A.L. (Mar. 2022)

"I really appreciated the guide and the other supplemental materials. Also the information about esophageal screening and radiologist resistance was good." A.S. (Mar. 2022)

"I liked the real life examples going through the different components and how it included common mistakes." C.H. (Mar. 2022)

"I routinely complete MBSS utilizing the MBSImP and this was a great refresher. Providing a numerical rating scale to categorize impairment as mild, moderate or severe is beneficial." C.S. (Mar. 2022)

"I liked the recent research using MBSImP. Very well presented and updated by Dr. Martin-Harris." E.M. (Mar. 2022)

"Review of scoring especially those frequently missed items. I enjoyed the case study portion in turning impairment into practical, objective goals. I liked the set up with broken up presentations as well as option to preview of test prior." K.M. (Feb. 2022)

"A very practical course that covered decisions/judgements that arise in everyday practice with helpful advice on how to approach them. The interweaving of relevant research that has been carried out since I completed my initial MBSImP training 10 years ago was excellent - gives me renewed energy and enthusiasm to continue to pursue and promote standardized practice in relation to testing in my facility." A.C. (Feb. 2022)

"The guide and detailed review of each component with Conclusions and Clinical Implications as well as areas Frequently Missed were all very helpful. Dr. Martin-Harris did a great job of incorporating visuals as well as examples so that learning was more in line with applying new learning or clarifying an area that was fuzzy previously." C.W. (Jan. 2022)

"Excellent organization, presentation and very functional application. Thank you." J.G. (Jan. 2022)

"Thorough content. Well paced. Supported by research." S.W. (Jan. 2022)

"I appreciated the review of common errors that clinicians make in scoring and the corresponding visuals delineating structures and exactly where to focus judgement for components such as tongue base retraction. It is hard to stay up-to date for me during this pandemic as I just don't take time to read studies - I appreciate that Bonnie Martin Harris referenced the ongoing research and the findings that have published to date." N.L. (Jan. 2022)

"I especially appreciated the focus on common errors in scoring (vs reviewing the entire protocol in detail.) I also liked the case study that was very relevant to typical cases we see and the example of a treatment protocol, short and long term goals, and outcomes driving recommendations for the next level of care." D.A. (Jan. 2022)

"The format was conducive to a renewal course and provided valuable information in reasonable detail and within a reasonable amount of time." K.S. (Jan. 2022)

This program is offered for 0.35 ASHA CEUs (Intermediate Level; Professional Area).

ASHA CEUs: NSS online courses are registered with ASHA and are offered for ASHA CEUs. The number of ASHA CEUs is noted above. Note that 0.1 ASHA CEU = 1 contact hour = equals 1 CEE.

ASHA CEUs: Attendees must meet at least one of the following conditions in order to be eligible to earn ASHA CEUs:

• Current ASHA Member
• ASHA Certificate of Clinical Competence (CCC) Holder
• Licensed by a state or provincial regulatory agency to practice speech-language pathology (SLP) or audiology
• Credentialed by a state regulatory agency to practice SLP or audiology
• Credentialed by a national regulatory agency to practice SLP or audiology
• Engaged in a Clinical Fellowship under the supervision of an individual with their ASHA CCC
• Currently enrolled in a master's or doctoral program in SLP or audiology

If an attendee is not an ASHA member or CCC holder but meets any of the above criteria, they may inform the ASHA CE Registry of their eligibility by visiting this site.